Hail up!

Peace and love and all that stuff...I is a StrangeRasta and these are my musings

Thursday, 13 November 2014

Nigga Nigga Nigga

Perspective. Often overlooked.

Once during a Political Science class, "African Political Philosophy in Antiquity", or something like that, the point was made that it is always going to be really hard to fully understand/ grasp the concepts of these old African systems of thought because we are approaching them from a point of understanding that is western/European. No matter your emotional alignment, or your political mooring, the social and educational foundation upon which they lie is going to be, primarily European, specifically English in the case of Barbados. It is an uncomfortable thing to hear and can be quite disconcerting. I was in my Pan-African, Rastafari, Black Power freshness; I was different to those still stuck on that western train, that "Babylon Shitstem" mentality; I was supposed to be different.
I digressed, that is not the point nor purpose of this post. I am not sure it is even relevant.





Nigga.
Who can and who can't say it?
If we - niggas - stop saying it, the perpetuation of white supremacy will end, or at least weaken, right?
Hurtful word and no one should say it; period!
Context, it is all about context.
My brother, my nigga.

Lots of opinions, from a lot of places about one, maybe two, word(s) depending on if you draw a distinction between nigga and nigger.

Piers Morgan, the most recent person of note to attempt this, has called for the discontinued use of the word nigga/nigger. He lists a variety of reasons to support his position, none new, most reasonable, one ignorant and all viewed through the historical lens of white supremacy and political and institutional black oppression and dehumanization. There is a kind of white guilt that informs his position, which is fine. Understanding the past properly frames contemporary life experiences and provides the knowledge needed for advancement. Of course, there is also a kind of white privilege that somehow fuels the notion that his opinion is relevant, which largely, it is not. Piers, this is not about you nor your feelings. Most importantly to note though, is that this is not black people's problem either; nigga is not a black creation. The society that created the term, and the negativity attached to it, is to blame for the usage, not those negatively affected that have sought to repurpose it positively, however controversially, for themselves.

Otherwise motivated but on the same side as Piers, would be black people who call for its disuse. These are usually, older folk from the civil rights era and people generally who hold that era as the foundation of the contemporary black experience. For them there is a very emotional connection to the word, and the very malicious and dehumanizing manner with which it was used by whites towards blacks, often times accompanied by dogs, burning crosses, hanging bodies, fire hoses and all manner of psychological and physical assault and degradation. This set cannot fathom why people would refer to themselves and their loved ones with such a term. For them, this word cannot be reclaimed nor can it be repurposed. This call for disuse also comes from a place heavily influenced by white supremacy, black oppression and abuse.

The above perspectives are all centered on the historical use of the word by whites towards blacks. Anyone coming to the table on this issue from the perspective of its historical white usage will always call for the discontinuation of its usage, whether a well meaning old white man like Piers or black people with a civil rights era foundation. From that perspective the word is, and can only be, hurtful.

There is another lens through which we can see this nigga/nigger thing. Niggas have been calling niggas niggas for a long time, from way back in the day. I do not mean, thefirsteverhiphopalbum back in the day or when Paula Deen was a little girl type back in the day, but before America recognized black men as citizens, like before 1865 type of back in the day. When nigger went from being a simple reference to black people, to a reprehensible entity to be feared and kept ignorant, is when the nigga to nigga endearment and empowerment started. This black to black, nigga to nigga, perspective is also important. From this perspective, the discomfort felt by contemporary whites which is rooted in white supremacy's legacy is less relevant to black people, and allows us, if we so desire, to say "So what?!" to their discomfort and dislike. This perspective is in direct opposition to the previous one.


"Why wouldn’t you want to embody that which most scares your oppressor and change its meaning?" - Talib Kweli


Piers Morgan dismisses African Americans, mainly African American youth, as using the word "in an ironic way." Piers goes on, "They’re aware of its history; they know from their parents and grandparents that arrogant, dumb, racist whites used it as a wicked, derogatory insult against their black slave forebears. And they enjoy the freedom of being able to say it now in the knowledge that it’s become taboo for whites to do so." He then claims that he understands and empathizes. He does not, not really, but, more interesting is the condescending tone he delivers this message in. It is as if he is explaining to a toddler, for the hundredth time, that he cannot eat his crayons. "Take those crayons from your mouth Timmy, you know you shouldn't eat them." What he could have gone on to say would have been something like, "Also, your black slave forebears began to use the word as a badge of honour and as a term of endearment among themselves, flipping the negativity of the arrogant, dumb, racist whites into a positive - something that they have done all throughout the slavery and Jim Crow experiences." He could have then gone on to reference comfort food, souse and negro spirituals and black churches, which are all the nigga to their respective origins' nigger, ie. the negatives made positives.
There is a lack of understanding by the youth as to the hurtful power that that word holds for their parents and grandparents, and that of course comes a less racially volatile contemporary environment, but its continued use within the black community is not just a simple "irony." That is why Mr. Morgan cannot say that he understands.


"There is no other word like it in the English language, encompassing both the ugliest sort of hate and a communal, if subversive, sense of love and affection, depending upon who is saying it and in what context. It can be wielded as a tool of both white racism and black empowerment. Its most accomplished practitioners can drop it into conversation as a noun, adjective, verb or interjection." - Lonne O'Neal Parker


When approached from the perspective of reclamation, empowerment and resistance, the word is open for continued use within the black community. Continued use is very much still a part of the racial politick. Remember that while we like to focus on the contemporary experience, the African American experience in America has only been one of full citizenship for about half a century. Post racial societies do not yet exist anywhere, despite what we are told.

As anyone on the pro-use side will tell you, there are times when even internal use of the word will have negative connotations and go from an endearing term to a degrading, and oppressive one. Any reference to struggling, hustling, grinding, working hard, celebrations, family, friends, etc. are usually positive nigga uses. References to merking niggas, dope boy niggas, ignorant niggas, my niggas v. dem niggas etc. are negative nigga uses and perpetuate the negativity of the term, and actually go against the intetntion of the reclamation of the term. Problematic, but only so for those with either of the two perspectives above. There is another perspective; it is held mostly by the youth. It is not as nuanced as the other two. Thanks to popular music, multiculturalism and failure to understand or care for context, the term, which was always akin to 'dude' or 'brother' within parts of the black community, has taken on that meaning for a new generation, but spans a wider racial demographic. Again problematic, but language was never known for being stagnant and the youth are not famed for their understanding of, nor penchant for, the historical context of the world they occupy.

The Washington Post has done a pretty interesting interactive project about this. You can tailor make your own video, have a random one done for you, and afterwards you can spend time exploring all of the videos. This project accompanies the article linked above in the Lonne O'Neal Parker quote. Click here to go to THE N-WORD: An Interactive Project Exploring a Singular Word.

Ultimately, however, disuse, continued use or the disconnected, new generation use aside, the racial problems in the world are not rooted in any word. Institutional and structural issues within societies are what give birth to, and maintain, the injustice of racial inequality. Stop and frisk, school to prison pipelines, prison industrial complex, the racial disparity in convictions and sentencing, ingrained fear of black bodies, unrecognized and unchecked white privilege, unchecked police brutality, etc. facilitate America's racial problems. Add to that the fact that Jim Crow is not a history lesson, but a living memory for many Americans. Add to that the fact that John Crawford III and Eric Garner happened a few months ago.
Let us not get too distracted by nigga this and nigga that. Those with malicious intent will use it regardless. More discrete, but equally ill intentioned, people will use modern day euphemisms like "n-word" or "urban" or "inner city" and smile =) all the while. Police will call you sir or ma'am and still arrest you more frequently than any other racial group. Words, caricatures, gestures and symbols are all applied or repurposed afterwards to fit the structure.
Niggas got better shit to do than to focus too much on semantics, not because it is unimportant, but because it's a red herring topic in the racial debate and we have bigger fish to fry.

Sunday, 10 March 2013

And That Is The Gospel Truth


“The only way to the heaven is through the Lord Jesus Christ. Believe me, that is the gospel truth.” These were the words that a friend had offered to me in one of our religious debates. This idea of truth, the one he represents because of his Christian faith, is flawed. The flaw, however, is not that he believes truth to be an absolute entity, because it is absolute, but it is that he thinks that Christianity is that absolute.

Before I can explain properly the flaw I mentioned above let me first define truth. Truth simply is what is. That is, in the absence of all hindrances of interpretation as a result of socialization, religion, education and all other shapers of realities, truth is what remains, absolute and nonnegotiable. Say that there is a fish tank with a fish in it and there are five people at various points about this fish tank, four of them are looking into the fish tank and seeing the fish and another is backing the fish tank and is not seeing the tank nor the fish. To each of the four persons who are looking into the tank the fish will appear to be at a different point in the water due to the refraction and reflection of light, through the water in the tank, the glass of the tank, and the air, and then of course the actual interpretation of the information collected in their eye and processed in their brains. This is reality to each of them. Not truth, reality. Reality is shaped and developed; truth is absolute. None of these four persons will argue as to the existence of the fish, but they will argue about its location, colour, size, and other things about it. Were they to graphically represent the fish and the tank, taking into account the physical issues of interpretation, such as refraction and reflection, they would each get the same and exact location of the fish (accounting for parallax of course). In a scenario where this happens truth is discovered. As for the person not looking at the tank, there is no fish tank in his reality, and he therefore does not know about it nor the fish. However, because he does not see it or acknowledge it does not mean it does not exist. In his reality there is no concept of the fish in the tank, but the truth is that there is a fish tank. 

My friend is like one of the four persons looking into the tank. He lives a Christian reality and has seen the truth, but has not yet realised the inaccuracies that have led to his point of view, in other words he has not had the opportunity to graphically represent the fish and the fish tank. 

Examine the real core principles of any major religion in the world from antiquity to present and notice that they are all the same. From the forty-two laws of Ma’at, through the ten commandments of Moses, through the teachings of Buddha and of Jesus, to the modern day laws of countries, they are all basically the same. Even the non-religious believe in the basic core principles of their religious neighbours. Atheist will call these principles, “living right and moral lives.” The perfect being, or highest authority of any religion - God - is the representation, embodiment and source all of these principles. While even an atheist does not accept the existence of God they do not argue about the existence of these principles or that society and life operate much more efficiently when we live by them. These common principles are the fish. The separate religions and atheism are the fish tank, the water, the refraction and reflection, the air and all of the other things that affect how the fish is viewed. The interpretations of this information are the realities that are shaped just as each of the four persons thought the fish to be at a different location. 

Truth is without facade, it is not a slave to opinion or influence. Reality is nothing more than a point of view, which means that it can be changed. If it can be shattered of shifted, it is a paradigm, and a paradigm is a reality. You have heard of paradigm shifts and reality checks, but never of a truth shift or a truth check and that is because truth is, as was said earlier, absolute and nonnegotiable.


The truth however is not always what is important or even relevant. The truth is inaccessible a great deal of the time. Reality/perception/interpretation are more important. Ironically, that is the truth about that.


 *This is not to say there is a god, or that there isn't. I used the religious theme because the conversation with my friend, at the time of writing this, was fresh in my mind.


Monday, 18 February 2013

Lest we forget



When a politician or any other public official drops the line "Do you know who I am?" It should be powerful and get things to happen. You see that "I am" should resonate powerfully because it is the collective voice of a people. That "I am" is really a "We are", and should hold the power of the "we" entity.


The problem is that the "we" forget that the "I am" is merely an amalgamation of us. The problem is that the "I am" thinks that "he/she IS" and would then turn to the "we" as if he/she is something divinely placed over them.


There is too much indebtedness in our political reality, and this makes the democratic process here tedious and nearly silly. The MP, elected by their constituency, is more bound to the desires of the PM than they are to those of their constituents. The PM holds their "job" in his hands, and a PM ruling first above equals will not hesitate to remind a MP of this. 


Little men and women with god complexes. Egos fueled by an ignorant public, small testicled yes men, and folk with heads and asses high in the air displaying red, blue and yellow plumage like the yardfowls they are, making crass and loud noises about things that they have no control over.


To my lovelies sitting on the fence, I pray that you are sitting side saddle and not straddling the fence. For those "staying out of it" just remember that in this society, politics is overarching and all encompassing. Political inaction is a political action. Political activeness does not simply mean B, D, P or independent. You have a voice, use it.




Lest we forget, the politician is a servant of the public. We are the public. The politician is no more powerful than we allow; do not let fancy words and domineering attitudes make us forget this. Democracy allows for potentially the most revolutionary form of government, if only the masses remember that in democracy "we run tings, tings nuh run we."



Keep your mind clear and free.
Keep your voice clear and loud. Make your actions clear and firm.